Not that Castle
Freak is awful. It just falls short of what one has come
to expect from this talented troika. Such as sharp witty dialogue,
pitch black humor, innovative stories, and envelop-pushing carnage.
Freak is about this guy. You know who he is. You've
met him in hundreds of horror films. We all have. He's a regular
Joe, kind of a horror everyman, who's suffered some tragedy. Could
be he was born deformed. Or maybe burned or disfigured in a prank
gone bad. Yeah, I know what you're thinking. Been there, done
that. Anyway, he's shut away somewhere. An attic, a basement,
an asylum, a cabin in the woods. It's an old story.
case any Julia Roberts fans need to be clued in, the film is called Castle
Freak. Subtle title, no? At least Senator Lieberman
can't call on the FTC to charge Full Moon with false advertising.
The film is Castle
Freak, and it's about a castle freak.
the details of his all-too-common tale of woe: His mom was an Italian noblewoman
who fell in love with an American soldier. The soldier married and
impregnated her, then deserted her for the States. Left her heart-broken,
alone in her castle (well, where else would a noblewoman live?). So she took vengeance on their son. Chained him inside a dungeon,
whipped and beat and tortured him every day of his miserable life. Even maimed his genitalia. (I won't spoil the details, but guys,
be prepared to cringe.) After forty years of this, the noblewoman
dies intestate. Nobody knows about the son in the dungeon, so her
attorney locates her heirs in America.
minutes into the film, the American family is already arriving to inspect
their newly acquired castle. The lucky heirs consist of dad (Jeffrey
Combs), the missus (Barbara Crampton), and their blind daughter. Soon after they're settled, the freak escapes and the body count mounts. It's all pretty straightforward killer-freak-on-the-rampage stuff.
this freak desires women, although, his manhood incomplete, he's unable
to enjoy or satisfy them. This further frustrates him, with predictably
bloody results. "Progressives" might disdain another entry in horror's
long tradition of portraying freaks and retards as sexually frustrated
rapists, but there you have it. Take it for what it's worth.
Freak does try to "stretch" the genre with an Oprah subtext. Dad's alcohol problem resulted in the car crash that killed his son and
blinded his daughter. Although his daughter has forgiven him, his
wife cannot. They haven't slept together in nine months. So
dad too is sexually frustrated, and guilt-ridden, even as he continues
to fight the bottle.
okay subtext, in a soapish sense. Yes, there's symbolism in there
(the freak's childhood photo resembles dad's dead son), and it allows for
some closure at film's end, with the wife finding reason to forgive. It's not a bad storyline, but considering the talents involved, one expects
likes to attach promos it calls "video magazines" at the end of its films,
mainly trailers and "behind-the-scenes" stuff. Combs and Crampton
provide aesthetic assessments of Gordon's work. (Now, just how honest
will the average out-of-work actor be when discussing an employer's work?) Combs allows that Castle
Freak is humorless, but claims to believe it strengthens the
horror, and that Gordon was right to eschew humor.
is a sterling character actor, with unique features and intense facial
ticks. He shines when delivering quirkily funny lines. Re-Animator and The
Frighteners (1996) display Combs at his darkly comedic best. But he disappoints in the dreary Dr.
Mordrid: Master of the Unknown (1992). To cast Combs in
a humorless role is to waste his edgy gifts. It's like hiring Tiger
Woods to caddy.
Crampton was only called to be pretty in Re-Animator,
but rose to glory in From Beyond, playing
a broad range from repressed scientist, to sexual libertine, to madwoman. In Castle
Freak, she's cast in the thankless role of mother. She's
got the soap credentials (The
Young & The Restless), and competently handles her limited
material. But she can handle so much more than she's given.
Fuller plays the freak. He claims the body makeup required six hours
to apply. He's an effective freak, but no more. Unlike Karloff
or Dafoe (Shadow of the Vampire),
Fuller fails to emote a sympathetic persona from beneath his heavy makeup. The fault is not entirely his. The script offers him little opportunity. (But neither did Karloff have lines in his first Frankenstein monster portrayal).
anyone protest that Castle
Freak's low budget makes comparisons to Frankenstein or Shadow of the Vampire inapposite,
note that the freak in The Unseen was hideous
and inarticulate (and yes, he had a frustrated sexual thing for Barbara
Bach), but his death was unexpectedly poignant. (On the opposite
end of the freak spectrum, fans of envelop-pushing, grindhouse splatter
will delight in The
Grim Reaper (Italian 1981, aka Anthropophagus),
whose freak performs a late-term abortion on an unwilling woman, with his
freak resides in the middle of the spectrum. Yes, he callously racks
up a body count, but other freaks are both more prolific and more savage
in their technique. Yes, he has personal issues, but other freaks
have handled their issues with more aplomb.
and Crampton are enjoyable to watch, but you wish the script had given
free reign to their talents. You wish Gordon had used his immense
talent for frenetic black comedy to deliver another Re-Animator or From Beyond. (The dreadful Bride
of Re-Animator (1989) could have used his touch.)
want to stretch. But sometimes their old work is so outstanding,
you want multiple encores. Instead, we have Castle
Freak, a serviceable killer-freak film.
Review copyright by Thomas
"Communist Vampires" and "CommunistVampires.com" trademarks are currently unregistered, but pending registration upon need for protection against improper use. The idea of marketing these terms as a commodity is a protected idea under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. s 1114(1) (1994) (defining a trademark infringement claim when the plaintiff has a registered mark); 15 U.S.C. s 1125(a) (1994) (defining an action for unfair competition in the context of trademark infringement when the plaintiff holds an unregistered mark).